Phil
Welcome to Board Talk. This is Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow of ITM Consulting, where here to answer your questions regarding SMT process and assembly issues.

Today we’re talking to you from ITM’s nonconforming employee room, which is next to nonconforming materials room, but that has nothing to do with today’s question.

Today’s question is a good one. What basis is stencil thickness decided in the case of BGA's or fine pitch components?

Jim
We’ve talked before, and most of us are aware of the issues of the different size and style of components that need to be processed on the same board and the need to have different volumes of solder paste for different components, and related to using different thicknesses of stencils.

Some people call it mixed print or broadband. There are a number of names for it. Okay, I’ve got particular components. What thickness stencil should I use if I have a 55 mil pitch BGA? What thickness stencil should I use if I have a 0.4 millimeter CSP?

As we’re designing apertures, we have to calculate aspect ratios and so forth to make sure we get good printing. If you really analyze this topic and start to think about calculations and deciding on stencil thicknesses and apertures, the most obvious thing that comes out in terms of the data that you need to make this analysis is the volume of solder paste required for a specific joint.

If I have a 50 mil pitch QFP, and I have a particular pad geometry that I’m using for that, what is the volume of solder paste, or the range of the volume of solder paste that will give me an acceptable joint?

From the qualitative side, I know if I use this stencil too thin, I won’t get enough paste and I won’t have good fillers. Likewise, on a small part, fine pitch part, if I use a stencil that’s too thick, I will get too much paste. We all know that, and that’s the thing we try to struggle with.

But, in trying to make it quantitative, what I really need to know is, when I’m talking about using the thick – the common one, using a thick stencil and aperture reduction. We talk – we talk about aperture reduction and area and aspect ratios based upon the printing parameters, which is valid, but there’s the other issue of how much do I need to reduce that to give me the proper volume of solder paste.

It comes back to what do you need in terms of the volume of solder paste. And to be quite frank, and I throw this out into our listening audience, is there a source that can supply that answer?

I’ve talked to a number of people in the industry and when we finally get around to hemming and hawing and talking about it, nobody can provide any answers. I have looked at some IPC specs and stencil design and I honestly don’t remember the number off the top of my head, but it talked about an aperture for using a 6 mil stencil and a 4 mil stencil.

I calculated the ratio between those two stencils, both of which they were proposing as acceptable. It was over 2:1 in terms of the volume that we’d get from the different stencil thicknesses and aperture design.

My feeling was, again, it’s only qualitative, it seems too big a range, and keeps begging the question, what is the appropriate volume for a given components and given pad sizes.

Phil
So we’re all looking for a holy grail of calculator that will automatically calculate for a given part what that volume should be.

Jim
There is a spec out there, IPC or anybody else that we don’t know about, we would love to hear from you. We plead ignorance. But as I said, we’ve talked to a number of pretty knowledgeable people and nobody can answer it.

Phil
Maybe if we get desperate enough, Dr. Ron Lasky can come to our rescue and come up with the volume coach. You hear that, Ron?

Jim
Okay, I’ve ranted enough.

Phil
On that note, this is Jim Hall and Phil Zarrow saying don’t solder like my brother.